bwinkjet wrote:
> In the long run
>no 3rd party ink developer will further progress in this area like
>Epson, Canon or HP will out of the need to be competitive and grab
>market share.
>
>
>
That's like saying that major auto manufacturers should be able to sell
proprietary gasoline or oil for their vehicles, because only they, not
gasoline or petrochemical companies will do the work to create
automobiles of such quality. It's a chimeric paper tiger.
It's the same argument people offered about telephone products when the
whole AT&T breakup lawsuit process began. "Only AT&T can produce those
nice high quality phones we get, they underwrite the cost through the
telephone charges." Frankly, it's a pathetic argument for maintaining a
monopoly. We have more telephone hardware options than ever, a plethora
of providers for that hardware, etc. that would not have existed absent
the breakup. Monopolies by their inherent nature stifle innovation and
development, they only superficially seem to advance it.
If you are simply choosing to side with monopolists because you are
comfortable with the current product-set and the status quo, fine, say
so. Please don't try putting lipstick on the pig by asserting as
complete fallacy about technological advancement. No matter how much
makeup you trowel on, it'll still be a pig underneath it all.
Keith
Keith Krebs
"Just some guy," caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer
User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo
Publications), at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/
and the Multiverse's largest Canon printer User Community at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon-printers
"For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together
guys"
****************************************************************
CONFIDENTIALITY & COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
This e-mail message, including attachments and contents, is © Copyright,
Keith Krebs, 2001-2006, All Rights Reserved. It is expressly for the
sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Absent the express written authorization of the
author, any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, transfer, or
distribution is explicitly prohibited and taken at your own risk. If you
are not, or are unsure whether you are, the intended recipient, please
contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original
message. Violations will be prosecuted to the FULL extent allowed under
applicable civil and criminal law. Imagery published or distributed in
violation of these conditions shall be subject to a $1500/image
liquidated damages charge, in addition to any applicable Copyright
violation penalties.
POV IMage Service Banner
****************************************************************
{ The P.O.V. Image Service Website is still at http://www.p-o-v-image.com/ }
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Lawsuit -- MIS
2006-02-26 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.