Hi Roy, Thanks for the reply and sorry for the double-posting in QTR group. Naively I was thinking that perceptual was providing the ability to compress L* (Y) "uniformely" thus preserving general contrast. While relative would not re-scale the same (except vis a vis white media) and provide only a somehow flat BW print. Apparantly the ICC building process makes it irrelevant to dig further. As for softproofing, I'd guess it makes sense to remain coherent and adopt perceptual, BPC, no ink black simul. As it sounds above, I'm pretty new to this... Olivier --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy Harrington" <roy@...> wrote: > > > Hi Olivier, > > I don't have a particularly special answer. The first ICC profiles I made were > based on single-channel transfer functions so there was one one curve. The > current ones have the capability of 3 intents (Perceptual, Relative, Saturation) > but exactly the same curve is put into all 3 intents. For the printing side of the > profile as far as I can figure you will always get the same result. Soft-proofing > however involves lots of profile conversions and although the QTR curves are > all the same how you setup your soft-proof (intent, bpc, ink black) give several > different black conversions. > > For grayscale I haven't found anything definitive about differences in the 3 intents. > > Roy >
Message
Re: QTR rendering intent (was Working space for BW)
2006-02-27 by Olivier
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.