Keith, > In fact, if > the inks were the innovative feature, then EPSON would be able to charge > whatever they wanted for those inks and they could easily defend > infringements against the ink patents. The fact that they do not do so, > but guard the chips and cartridge patents, puts the lie to your line of > reasoning. Does it? As I said somewhere in another post, HP has just settled a case where a firm - Inkcycle -has had to pay up for selling refilled carts that infringed HP patents on ink. They had to alter the composition of the ink. They apparently didn't know HP had patents on ink! http://news.com.com/HP,+InkCycle+settle+inkjet+refilling+suit/2100-1041_3-5737561.html Probably no problem for B&W inks unless they are copying patented carrier/solvent mixes or resin coatings. Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Editor P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@...>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Lawsuit -- MIS
2006-02-27 by Bob Frost
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.