Digital BW, The Print

I didn't mean to offend.  I simply meant that the debate was amongst people
who are not lawyers and ill-versed in the legal issues, accusations and
defences involved, and amongst people who are not involved in the present
actions and hence unable to affect the result.  I'm all for lobbying in an
effective manner, ie becoming involved, if that's what people want to do,
but arguing amongst us girls is not going to achieve anything other than use
up bandwidth.  :-)


> From: Bob Frost <bob@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:22:21 -0000
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Lawsuit -- MIS
> 
> Steve,
> 
> Fine, I was getting bored by it anyway.
> 
> As for your uncalled-for remark about 'unqualified and uninvolved people', I
> consider myself involved since I have had about ten different Epson printers
> and currently have four, one of which I use for B&W printing. As to my
> qualifications, well my main training was in discovering facts  - 35 years
> of it in a major University - with a formal PhD to show that I can think
> logically and discern the scientific facts from the fiction.
> 
> If you are going to Court against Epson, it is best, surely, to have the
> facts in your case, rather than fiction - of which there seems to be an
> awful lot about.
> 
> May the best man win. - ooops, or woman.
> 
> Bob Frost.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Kale" <stevekale@...>
> 
> 
> Guys.  Can we take this stuff offline or at least constrain it to
> constructive action, be it protesting the action in some formal way (Paul's
> recommendations) or hedging your risk by acquiring carts today.  All this
> banter back and forth by unqualified and uninvolved people is all just
> worthless traffic.