Digital BW, The Print

Howard,
 Just curious, did you ever solve the problem with Max? I recently had
similar problems with Museo Max jamming in my printer. I tried loading
it front and rear and also using the thick paper setting, to no avail.
 To my eye, I agree, it is WAY thicker than VFA. At least the batch I
have is.

Best Regards
Ginny



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "how786"
<how786@...> wrote:
>
> 
>   Thanks. I did try one sheet at a time in the rear feeder to no
> avail. And, yes, it is really stiff, too!
> Howard
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Atherton"
> <timatherton@> wrote:
> >
> >  
> > >   Has anyone used this paper in either a 2400 or 1800? It is the
> > >   thickest paper I've ever seen and jammed my 1800 even when the 
> > 1800
> > >   was set to 'thick' paper.
> > >   When I compared the thickness to the VFA, the Max appears at  
> > least
> > >   50% thicker! I am doubting Crane's quality control as they list 
> > the
> > >   thickness at 21. (The VFA is 19) The paper is a LOT thicker 
> > > than the VFA.
> > 
> > well - it is pretty thick, but more than anything it's really stiff
> > 
> > I tend to just load it on the rear sheet loader, one sheet at a time, 
> > though for bigger than letter size I have also run it through the 
> > main feed on the 2400
> > 
> > If you have the cut sheets in smaller sizes, it is 365 gsm which is 
> > pretty heavy stuff
> > 
> > (BTW - make sure you print the correct side - my box from digital art 
> > supplies was loaded upside down. Both sides of the paper are coated. 
> > But I believe only the side with the greater texture is the Museuo 
> > Max coating)
> > 
> > tim a
> >
>