Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Just starting B&W - 1280 w/ UT2 - Poor Contrast & Detail

2006-03-04 by Dan Derby

First let me say that I'm delighted to have my first post on this
group answered by two of my B&W heros, Paul Roark and Clayton Jones. 
 Secondly, as Clayton suggest, the answers were a bit depressing.  

Trying to consolidate the feedback from you both:

One:  I bought the wrong printer.  

Paul and Clayton both suggest the 1280 is out-of-date and difficult to
use.  You each suggest a different one   - Paul the R220, $100 from
Epson and Clayton the 2400, $849.99 - as the 1280 is a bit "long in
the tooth".   

My first reaction is that the 1280 produced great prints before, I see
no reason this one won't.  Besides, I'm a bit long in the tooth
myself...seems like a good match. 

Two:  Both of you were kind enough to also suggest some alternative
strategies.  

From Paul: Test files to trouble shoot the system.  Paul thanks. I
will, of course try the alternative purge pattern (I run a standard
nozzle check before each new file run) as well as see if I can run the
21-step file correctly.   I look forward to trying your more
sophisticated approach and reporting back.  I'm betting on "operator
error" as the root cause.

From Clayton:  Black Only is hard to beatÂ…unless you have $800 to
spare for a 2400. 

I looked at my early BO prints under a loupe and was surprised to see
the prominent dots. At normal viewing range, they were crisp, smooth
and had good contrast.  However, I was looking to expand both the size
of my "in studio" printing (hence the 1280) and add subtlety(tonal
range?) to my prints.  I read your write ups on BO previously but will
now go back and rethink what I'm doing.  Maybe I can get there on with
the BO route, too.

Gentlemen, thanks for your help.  It's obvious to me is that I do not
understand how these workflows work but I am determined to learn it. 
Please bear with me.

Dan

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.