That's right. He told us here that it is the blue spectrum that actually does most of the damage, not the uv, because the blue spectrum is much larger in total output. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: > > In an art catalog I saw another set of "tests" that tended to show dyes were > almost as good as pigments when they were sprayed with a UV spray. However, > when I read the fine print, the trick used became clear. They had coated > the dye test strip with a UV blocking subtance, and the pigments were > totally un-protected. Then they used only UV light for the fading. Of > course, the UV blocker was essentially opaque to the UV light, whereas the > pigs got a full dose of very damaging UV. Using UV light as the test source > terribly skewed the results. As Wilhelm has noted, in indoor display, it is > visible light (assuming no serious airborne pollutants) that does the > fading. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] A pigment or dye question
2006-03-08 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.