john dean wrote: > One of the very interesting developments in digital raw workflow > centers around the ability to shoot 3 bracketed frames - over, under, > and in the middle, drop them into PS CS2 with instant registration and > combine them instantly as one very smooth entity. It's a major > improvement in dynamic range over the one frame 35mm camera Perhaps over chromes. Not over negatives. One can easily capture the entire subject brightness range from featureless shadows to highlight detail on a white flower in bright mid-day summer sun with either color or B&W negative film. Here's an example: http://www.achromaticarts.com/big_image.php?path=flowers&img_num=2 With the breeze blowing, there's no method I know of that will let you capture this image with any digital imaging device commercially available. Which proves what exactly? Nothing other than you can do some things with film that you can't do with digital. There are undoubtedly many things you can do with digital that you can't do with film. The two technologies are intersecting sets - neither is wholly contained within the other. So back to the OPs problem - one should use the technology with which one is most comfortable. If that's film, so be it. If that's digital, so be it. -- Bruce Watson
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera
2006-03-23 by hogarth@snappydsl.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.