I look for Nikon to do the same in regard to their scanner division within a year. Otherwise the Canon will finish them off too. John --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Adam Maas <mykroft@...> wrote: > > Greg wrote: > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Adam Maas > > <mykroft@> wrote: > > > > > > PanF and similar can outperform affordable Digital. But if you shoot > > > high-ISO digital will provide cleaner images (especially at 3200). > > > > > > Note that the Scan Dual III and IV only produce around 10MP scans, > > you > > > aren't getting 20+MP of info from them. The 5400 will do better. > > > > > > > > > Is KM going to continue making scanners, or did those go the way of > > their cameras? > > > > > They're dead. Warranty service will continue until all are out of > warranty (next year sometime) but that's it. KM is shutting down their > entire photo business, although the film/chemical portion will not cease > operation for 1 year. > > -Adam >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera
2006-03-23 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.