Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera

2006-03-24 by Brian Ellis

"However for new images you will probably get better quality from a
camera such as the Nikon D200 or Canon 5D rather than film under almost
all circumstances"

At what print size do you think this is true? I have a 5D and some Canon L 
lenses due to arrive next week (finally gave up on Nikon) and I'm pretty 
excited but I'm not expecting to make prints comparable to those made from 
my 4x5 and 8x10 film scans at any size beyond 11x14  (I'll actually be happy 
if the 5D is just as good, forget about better, even at just 11x14). The 
(admittedly few) prints larger than 11x14 that I've seen from the much more 
expensive Canon Mark II Whateveritscalled were o.k. but certainly not the 
equal of comparably sized prints I've made and seen others make from a 4x5 
scan. The only large (over 11x14) prints I've seen from a digital source 
that can compare with those made from 4x5 scans were done with a digital 
back on a Mamiya body but that outfit cost $30,000. My 4x5 outfit cost about 
$4000 and if I wanted to scrimp it could have cost a whole lot less.

There are, of course, many benefits that can be obtained from a high quality 
digital camera that can't be obtained from 4x5 - mobility, instant feedback, 
ease of use, speed, etc. - but so far better print quality isn't one of them 
in my experience .

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Marshall" <petermarshall@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera


>I think the Epson V750 Pro (due in May) is going to make dedicated film
> scanners such as the Minolta ones obsolete, giving more or less the same
> quality as more expensive drum or virtual drum scanners, but with
> greatly improved ease and speed of use.
>
> However for new images you will probably get better quality from a
> camera such as the Nikon D200 or Canon 5D rather than film under almost
> all circumstances. And with cheaper models such as the D50 or D70 under
> most.
>
> Regards
>
> Peter Marshall
> petermarshall@...
> _________________________________________________________________
> My London Diary               http://mylondondiary.co.uk/
> London's Industrial Heritage: http://petermarshallphotos.co.uk/
> The Buildings of London etc:  http://londonphotographs.co.uk/
> and elsewhere......
>
>
>
> Greg wrote:
>> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Adam Maas
>> <mykroft@...> wrote:
>>
>>> PanF and similar can outperform affordable Digital. But if you shoot
>>> high-ISO digital will provide cleaner images (especially at 3200).
>>>
>>> Note that the Scan Dual III and IV only produce around 10MP scans,
>>>
>> you
>>
>>> aren't getting 20+MP of info from them. The 5400 will do better.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Is KM going to continue making scanners, or did those go the way of
>> their cameras?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources 
>> as they are often being updated.
>>
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>>
>> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to 
>> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this 
>> same page.
>>
>> Please follow these basic guidelines:
>> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
>> keep them short.
>> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. 
>> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the 
>> membership without notice.
>> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W 
>> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from 
>> the membership.
>> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
>> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner 
>> and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the Files 
>> section:
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>>
>> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
>> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND 
>> \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO 
>> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR 
>> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF 
>> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE 
>> \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN 
>> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE 
>> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) 
>> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) 
>> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
>> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
>> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as 
> they are often being updated.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to 
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same 
> page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep 
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. 
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the 
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W 
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from 
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner 
> and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the Files 
> section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND 
> \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO 
> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR 
> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF 
> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE 
> \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN 
> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE 
> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) 
> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) 
> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.