Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera (off topic)

2006-03-26 by Michael Vendrell

I agree with those who feel this is ON topic and is of
interest to me.  I did in fact receive new knowledge
and inspiration from this thread.  Digital is in a
constant state of change so 3 months can sometimes
mean a lot.  Analog capture and processing has been
around for a long enough time for there to be many
"nooks and crannies" of experience and knowledge taht
can be shared and learned.   

If how the B&W image is captured , processed, and
scanned (if necessary) are not important parts of
printing, what is?

I admit that I have little personal interest in
spectrophotometers for example, but I just hit
<delete> and move on to the next post.  I don't write
and request the subject be banned or make prayers to
God to somehow edit these out before they hit my
in-box - or whose yet, strike the posters e-mute!

As others have said before,  I believe our hearts and
minds in this forum are large enough to accommodate
practically all that has to do with making beautiful
(to us)  B&W prints where the final or penultimate (as
in digital negatives) output is digital.

Personal attack is the only subject which I would
suggest be taboo.  And when someone says "don't take
this personally" one can be sure it was intended to
hurt.   Those who truly wish not to hurt orhers
feelings - ust don't - or if they do so
unintentionally or in the heat of the moment,
apologize.

Michael Vendrell, MD

--- Eric Neilsen  <e.neilsen2@...> wrote:

> Gary, I didn't take it personally. 
> 
> " (limited as it was ; ) )"
> 
> Just curious as to while the delete key is hard for
> some people to use?
> Times change, peoples knowledge bases grow; perhaps
> this month there would
> be some new information. 
> 
> Have a good day,
> 
> Eric
> 
> Eric Neilsen Photography
> 4101 Commerce Street
> Suite 9
> Dallas, TX 75226
> http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
> http://ericneilsenphotography.com
>  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> >
>
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Gary
> > Brown
> > Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 4:13 AM
> > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital
> camera (off topic)
> > 
> > Eric:
> > 
> > The fact is this topic and several others which
> seem to be on 1-3 month
> > cycles are discussed adnausium each time. It
> usually starts with "I'm new
> > to
> > the list" etc, etc, then it is the same
> information by the same people,
> > taking the same sides of the discussion over and
> over again. Anyone new to
> > the list can usually find what they are looking
> for by
> > searching old postings. I realize the searching
> utility in Yahoo is not
> > the
> > greatest, but it does work if one is willing to do
> the research.
> > 
> > There used to be time, that before you would write
> a letter to an author,
> > you would actually have to read the book. Don't
> get me wrong, I am
> > delighted
> > and marvel at the world of information that is
> available to me today, and
> > what I have learned from this list has been
> invaluable. That said, I get a
> > little tired of people unwilling to put in the
> time before they start
> > asking
> > questions.
> > 
> > By the way don't take things so personally.
> > 
> > Gary
> > 
> > www.pbase.com/garyallenbrown
> > www.gabsculpture.com
> > 
> > 
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Eric Neilsen "
> <e.neilsen2@...>
> > >To:
> <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> > >Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 5:49 PM
> > >Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs
> digital camera
> > 
> > 
> > >Sorry for the intrusion Gary. I have only been a
> member of the Digi B&W
> > >group for a little while. But I am curious as to
> why an inquiry into
> > which
> > >method someone chooses to express the digital B&W
> expression would bring
> > >such scorn? (limited as it was ; ) )
> > 
> > >Is not this group here to discuss the making of
> digital B&W images? Must
> > >not
> > >they come from some type of capture device? Man,
> I just moved an enlarger
> > >table with two 4x5 enlargers, a 38x50 vacume
> frame and table, a 4'x 8'
> > >finishing table and all just so that I could
> spray my ink jet prints
> > >without
> > >over spray going every where. Certainly a little
> rethinking comes into
> > >everyones life that deals with digital. Is it so
> much to ask to share a
> > >little insight?
> > 
> > >Eric Neilsen Photography
> > >4101 Commerce Street
> > >Suite 9
> > >Dallas, TX 75226
> > >http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
> > >http://ericneilsenphotography.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the
> Files, and other resources as
> > they are often being updated.
> > 
> >
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > 
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily
> digest, or you wish to
> > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership
> preferences by visiting this same
> > page.
> > 
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of
> earlier messages to keep
> > them short.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No
> personal attacks or flames.
> > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be
> removed from the
> > membership without notice.
> > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group
> topic of digital B&W
> > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic
> posts may be removed from
> > the membership.
> > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by
> the group rules and
> > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and
> decisions of the group Owner
> > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and
> Guidelines" in the Files
> > section:
> >
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> > 
> > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE
> THAT THE "OWNER" AND
> > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP
> SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
> > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
> CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE
> LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
> > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES),
> RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
> > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR
> TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
> > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO
> THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> > PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.