I agree with those who feel this is ON topic and is of interest to me. I did in fact receive new knowledge and inspiration from this thread. Digital is in a constant state of change so 3 months can sometimes mean a lot. Analog capture and processing has been around for a long enough time for there to be many "nooks and crannies" of experience and knowledge taht can be shared and learned. If how the B&W image is captured , processed, and scanned (if necessary) are not important parts of printing, what is? I admit that I have little personal interest in spectrophotometers for example, but I just hit <delete> and move on to the next post. I don't write and request the subject be banned or make prayers to God to somehow edit these out before they hit my in-box - or whose yet, strike the posters e-mute! As others have said before, I believe our hearts and minds in this forum are large enough to accommodate practically all that has to do with making beautiful (to us) B&W prints where the final or penultimate (as in digital negatives) output is digital. Personal attack is the only subject which I would suggest be taboo. And when someone says "don't take this personally" one can be sure it was intended to hurt. Those who truly wish not to hurt orhers feelings - ust don't - or if they do so unintentionally or in the heat of the moment, apologize. Michael Vendrell, MD --- Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen2@...> wrote: > Gary, I didn't take it personally. > > " (limited as it was ; ) )" > > Just curious as to while the delete key is hard for > some people to use? > Times change, peoples knowledge bases grow; perhaps > this month there would > be some new information. > > Have a good day, > > Eric > > Eric Neilsen Photography > 4101 Commerce Street > Suite 9 > Dallas, TX 75226 > http://e.neilsen.home.att.net > http://ericneilsenphotography.com > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] > On Behalf Of Gary > > Brown > > Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 4:13 AM > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital > camera (off topic) > > > > Eric: > > > > The fact is this topic and several others which > seem to be on 1-3 month > > cycles are discussed adnausium each time. It > usually starts with "I'm new > > to > > the list" etc, etc, then it is the same > information by the same people, > > taking the same sides of the discussion over and > over again. Anyone new to > > the list can usually find what they are looking > for by > > searching old postings. I realize the searching > utility in Yahoo is not > > the > > greatest, but it does work if one is willing to do > the research. > > > > There used to be time, that before you would write > a letter to an author, > > you would actually have to read the book. Don't > get me wrong, I am > > delighted > > and marvel at the world of information that is > available to me today, and > > what I have learned from this list has been > invaluable. That said, I get a > > little tired of people unwilling to put in the > time before they start > > asking > > questions. > > > > By the way don't take things so personally. > > > > Gary > > > > www.pbase.com/garyallenbrown > > www.gabsculpture.com > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Eric Neilsen " > <e.neilsen2@...> > > >To: > <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > >Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 5:49 PM > > >Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs > digital camera > > > > > > >Sorry for the intrusion Gary. I have only been a > member of the Digi B&W > > >group for a little while. But I am curious as to > why an inquiry into > > which > > >method someone chooses to express the digital B&W > expression would bring > > >such scorn? (limited as it was ; ) ) > > > > >Is not this group here to discuss the making of > digital B&W images? Must > > >not > > >they come from some type of capture device? Man, > I just moved an enlarger > > >table with two 4x5 enlargers, a 38x50 vacume > frame and table, a 4'x 8' > > >finishing table and all just so that I could > spray my ink jet prints > > >without > > >over spray going every where. Certainly a little > rethinking comes into > > >everyones life that deals with digital. Is it so > much to ask to share a > > >little insight? > > > > >Eric Neilsen Photography > > >4101 Commerce Street > > >Suite 9 > > >Dallas, TX 75226 > > >http://e.neilsen.home.att.net > > >http://ericneilsenphotography.com > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the > Files, and other resources as > > they are often being updated. > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily > digest, or you wish to > > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership > preferences by visiting this same > > page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of > earlier messages to keep > > them short. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No > personal attacks or flames. > > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be > removed from the > > membership without notice. > > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group > topic of digital B&W > > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic > posts may be removed from > > the membership. > > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by > the group rules and > > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and > decisions of the group Owner > > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and > Guidelines" in the Files > > section: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE > THAT THE "OWNER" AND > > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP > SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO > > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR > > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE > LOSSES (EVEN IF THE > > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN > > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), > RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE > > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) > > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO > THE DIGITAL BW, THE > > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera (off topic)
2006-03-26 by Michael Vendrell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.