John, and I agree with you as well in the vein of "this is better that that ... yada, yada, yada.... Michael --- John Moody <moodymz3@...> wrote: > Michael, > Agreed. My disappointment, and I believe what the > post you responded to > addressed, is the run-on commentary with little > substance. > My-dog-can-beat-up-your-dog comments get exhausting. > > In the past we discussed scanned film grain > appearance with the inkjet > process, and how it differs from darkroom prints. I > wonder if anyone has > tried printing 35mm scans with the K6/K7 inkset, and > how do they look > compared to ultrachrome QTR prints? > > Best regards, > John Moody > > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On > Behalf Of Michael > Vendrell > Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 1:18 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital > camera (off topic) > > I agree with those who feel this is ON topic and is > of > interest to me. <SNIP> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera (off topic)
2006-03-26 by Michael Vendrell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.