Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: 35mm scans printed with the K6/K7 inkset was RE: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera (off topic)

2006-03-26 by Michael Vendrell

When I get a break from my "day job" (I'm a medical
imaging specialist with sub-sub specialty in Breast
MRI and CAD for such) and moving houses I'm intending
on doing just that on my 2200 with NK7's.  I also have
6x6cm and 6x7cm negs most with Agfapan 25 or Tech Pan
to rescan with my Nikon 9000 (which just returned from
warranty repair) and then print. I haven't yet
approached a scanning process for my old 8x10 inch
TriX/HC110 negs.  I hope to though one day before I
get too old - I'll be 55 on 4/4!  When I get anything
worth sharing, I'll let you know...

Michael Vendrell

--- John Moody <moodymz3@...> wrote:

> Pardon me for not changing the subject previously.
> 
> Best regards,
> John Moody
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On
> Behalf Of John Moody
> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 1:53 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital
> camera (off topic)
> 
> Michael,
> Agreed.  My disappointment, and I believe what the
> post you responded to
> addressed, is the run-on commentary with little
> substance.
> My-dog-can-beat-up-your-dog comments get exhausting.
> 
> In the past we discussed scanned film grain
> appearance with the inkjet
> process, and how it differs from darkroom prints.  I
> wonder if anyone has
> tried printing 35mm scans with the K6/K7 inkset, and
> how do they look
> compared to ultrachrome QTR prints?
> 
> Best regards,
> John Moody
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.