When I get a break from my "day job" (I'm a medical imaging specialist with sub-sub specialty in Breast MRI and CAD for such) and moving houses I'm intending on doing just that on my 2200 with NK7's. I also have 6x6cm and 6x7cm negs most with Agfapan 25 or Tech Pan to rescan with my Nikon 9000 (which just returned from warranty repair) and then print. I haven't yet approached a scanning process for my old 8x10 inch TriX/HC110 negs. I hope to though one day before I get too old - I'll be 55 on 4/4! When I get anything worth sharing, I'll let you know... Michael Vendrell --- John Moody <moodymz3@...> wrote: > Pardon me for not changing the subject previously. > > Best regards, > John Moody > > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On > Behalf Of John Moody > Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 1:53 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital > camera (off topic) > > Michael, > Agreed. My disappointment, and I believe what the > post you responded to > addressed, is the run-on commentary with little > substance. > My-dog-can-beat-up-your-dog comments get exhausting. > > In the past we discussed scanned film grain > appearance with the inkjet > process, and how it differs from darkroom prints. I > wonder if anyone has > tried printing 35mm scans with the K6/K7 inkset, and > how do they look > compared to ultrachrome QTR prints? > > Best regards, > John Moody > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: 35mm scans printed with the K6/K7 inkset was RE: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera (off topic)
2006-03-26 by Michael Vendrell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.