Yes John,I have. I am printing a limited edition portfolio from Howtek drum scans of 35mm Leica tri x negatives, 16x20 on Hahnemuhle Museum Etching right now. After this one is finished my client wants another different portfolio of 20 editons also. I have previously output these files with a 9600 with QTR and Ultrachome. The K6 are to my client and me much nicer in everyway, color tone , black density, and especially smoothness of midtone and highlight values. I have liked a lot of inkjet monochrome work that I've done in the past but this is the first combination that I can say I really love. I believe there are about 4 or 5 really good ways to do mono inkjet these days but this is the best one I have worked with. I certainly hope it is economicly successful because I'm already totally dependent on it. However, drums scans of 4x5 blow away the 35mm in smoothnesss and range which is not surprising, and this is what I am starting to do with my own work. I've also done several drum scans of Scala 35mm transparency film on K6. Now that Scala stuff has really limited shadow info on the film but they were well exposed and they are good too. I will say on record that after trying about 5 or 6 other inksets over the years I'm totally sold on K6 or K7. To me its perfect, if you want neutral. I believe Jon is working on a glossy compatable version. Now if that is successful, with the better fiber gloss papers out there, I will surely seriously begin working with that combination as well and we would see a whole new resurgence in black and white photography. And of course Epson K3 for that is pretty amazing too for the glossy end of things. John I wonder if anyone has > tried printing 35mm scans with the K6/K7 inkset, and how do they look > compared to ultrachrome QTR prints? > > Best regards, > John Moody >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera (off topic)
2006-03-26 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.