Michael, I'm a young 64 11/12 and have no problem hiking with my 4x5 or 8x10 field outfits in a backpack, if I wanted to, and I could use the digital gear too for other situations. It is like the epiphany I had years ago when a waiter asked what salad dressing I wanted - I realized that I could have more than one. However, there are always practical considerations to factor. My professional and other interests leave not a large amount of time for b&w photography, my passion. For amateurs like me, the DSLR is a Godsend, along with inkjet printing. I can accept the compromises in image quality (which I see as not that great, actually, if you have good gear - the overall image is still the thing), and the higher technology cost, because it allows me to pursue my hobby. The clincher, to which you refer: I could be down at the bar with friends instead of changing out sheet film in my hotel room. Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On > Behalf Of Michael Vendrell > Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 6:46 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Great Photographic Artists [was > Scanning 35mm vs digital camera) > I'm a fairly young 54&11/12 and could, if I wanted to, use > the 8x10, but just can't seem to get up the enthusiasm for > lugging it and tripod around anymore - not to mention loading > the holders and developing the sheets one at a time. And, as > Peter pointed out, view-camera on tripod does confine one to > certain types of subjects and situations for which I've "paid > my dues" but my interests lie mainly elsewhere now.
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Great Photographic Artists [was Scanning 35mm vs digital camera)
2006-03-27 by Ken Carney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.