Hello Howard, >You've mentioned using both a 220 and 2400 for B&W prints. I'm >wondering what goes into your thought process, how you evaluate an >image and decide whether to print it BO or on the 2400 Adv. B&W mode. >I'd appreciate learning about this. If you have read my articles about BO printing you may be familiar with the summary list of advantages it offers. I feel that it is superior to full ink methods in every regard except one, which of course is the grainy effect caused by the dots. So BO is always my first preference. However, some images look great in BO and some don't, and you can't be certain if an image will work until you try it. Since I do my initial proofing in BO, by the time an image is completely worked up I have usually formed an opinion about it. Sometimes an image is so strong as a BO print that I don't bother making a K3 print. Sometimes an image is obviously weak and there's no question that it needs to be K3. And sometimes I'm unsure and have to compare the two versions before I can decide. Sometimes it's a tough decision because each will have strengths and weaknesses. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: BO query for Clayton and others
2006-03-30 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.