> Just an observation: My prints look better behind glass, in a way > that seems apart from the glossiness the glass imparts. They also > look their richest in lower light, such as late evening. Some have > suggested I display them with no light at all : ) James > > 350 Nm is roughly were UV light is cut off by normal window > glass so a small portion goes through. In the past there have > been numbers mentioned like 15% for its contribution to light > fading indoors, nothing higher. > > And it is correct that better UV blocking will influence the > color of the prints as well, especially when some fluorescence > in ink and paper plays a role in the original color control of > the print. > > Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Interesting comment re UV filtering
2006-04-01 by James Irelan