Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] analog/digital Megapixels

2006-05-02 by Scott Hendershot

John,

You suggested that "film is relatively cheap to shoot". Just a comment on 
the relative cost. My lab just raised the price to process a single sheet of 
4x5 to $5.50. I shoot polaroids to proof my exposures. So for shooting a box 
of 50 sheets:

Film (50 sheets)   $95
Processing (C-41)   $275
Polaroid (2 boxes of 20) $140
Total $505

Brings my cost to roughly $10 per exposure. Fortunatly every exposure I make 
results in a perfect image (wink wink.)

Scott

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "sinar001" <jnolly@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] analog/digital Megapixels


In this digital world, flexibility is really the answer. While I can proudly 
say, "film is dead", I
completely empathize with Tyler's love of film grain for a "specific look". 
Sure, film is
relatively cheap to shoot, but then you have to process it, then scan it. . 
. the workflow
with a digital camera is so-o-o much easier and quicker.

Wouldn't it be great if someone like Andromeda software 
(http://andromeda.com/main/
photoshop.php) could be talked into developing a grain filter that would 
satisfy the likes
of Tyler, as Ernst has suggested? Then you could shoot digital, get creamy 
grain-free color
images, then convert to B&W apply the grain filter to achieve exactly the 
kind of look you
want.

John Nollendorfs


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" 
<deanwork2003@...>
wrote:
>
> I know. I just had a client leave here 10 minutes ago. She said, "but
> you know, I like noise". There you go. Its a whole different ball
> game. Sometimes digital capture is really interesting, and sometimes
> it is a total nightmare and you never know from one day to the next
> which it will be.
>
> john
>
>
>
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
> <tyler@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, CDTobie@ wrote:
> > >
> > > ...Higher image
> > > resolution, be it in film or digital, sounds like a better idea to me!
> >
> > Exactly!
> >
> > Regarding the rest, and the original questions, I guess my point is
> > that there are no straightforward answers. The more I do this stuff
> > the more I realize any solution depends on a number of factors and one
> > approach may suit only a given set of problems.
> > If the discussion were severely limited to say, 8x10 prints, or maybe
> > portraiture only, or both, things get more straightforward very quickly.
> > I made a print here for an excellent photographer, very graphic and
> > abstract, motion blur, nighttime, shot from a train window with a very
> > small digital point a shoot... she had me make a 30x40.
> > It's beautful.
> > Tyler
> >
>






Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as 
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to 
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same 
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep 
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. 
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the 
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W 
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from 
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and 
Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND 
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU 
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY 
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, 
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND 
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE 
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY 
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR 
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY 
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER 
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.

Yahoo! Groups Links

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.