Hello Tyler, >...these kinds of comparisions, with real prints not numbers, >have to be done by those interested in nailing down a personal >materials preference. Thank you, well said. It's so easy to get caught up in the numbers and think that's all that counts. There's a whole 'nother world of perception out there that often defies explanation, especially when it comes to art. Take, for example, the recent work of Sally Mann, who is one of today's most acclaimed photographic artists "Mann has won numerous awards, including Guggenheim and National Endowment for the Arts fellowships. Her photographs are in the permanent collections of many museums, including The Museum of Modern Art and the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York, and the Smithsonian American Art Museum in Washington, D.C." Her current Deep South photos are bringing wide acclaim, yet they are the very antithesis of everything we attribute to AA and the western landscape school: often underexposed, out of focus, extreme vignetting, corner softness, light leak streaks, or any combination of these. Yet, they convey a powerful emotional intensity. Here's a quote of her answering a question about her equipment: "Well, you know I told you that none of my equipment has ever been any good, I certainly could go out and buy a good, tack-sharp lens that would take the perfect picture that's in focus from end to end. But instead, I spend an awful lot of time at that antique mall looking around for these lenses with just the right amount of decrepitude. The glue has to be peeling off of the lens elements, it's great if its mildewed and out of whacka lens is made up of several different pieces of glass which are supposed to stay glued in the right relationship with each otherbut my most prized lens has one of the pieces of glass askew, so when the light comes in it it's refulgent. It just bounces all around and does this great sort of luminescent thing on the glass. You can tell a good ruined lens right from the get-go....they are the ones you find in the trash cans of old photo studios, in some ghost town in Iowa. I mean, that's the kind of lens I'm looking for." Some incredibly beautiful landscapes are grainy, soft focus and low dmax (often platinum). There is more to this than numbers. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Silver Rag, Hahnemuehle, and Innova Fiba Gloss Comparison
2006-06-09 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.