Clayton, I have routinely used Renaissance Wax on my silver gelatin prints. It protected the surface, made spotting and etching invisible, and "enriched" the shadows. By "enriched" I mean the shadows had a greater luminosity - they "glowed" more. I didn't darken the shadows, just made them richer. I did some tests of coatings on Innova F Type Gloss Ultra Smooth paper using Premier Print Shield and Chem Jet Semigloss spay coatings and the Renaissance Wax from Light Impressions. The prints were made on an Epson 2400 using the stock Epson K3 inks with PK. I treated a print after it had air dried for 24 hours by masking sections to allow for a 6 fold test on one print The best "look" was from the wax treatment with no initial spray - It had the most shadow luminosity and detail plus no gloss differential that I could see. The 2nd best was an initial spray of Premier Print Shield followed by a wax job after letting the sprayed print dry for a day. The 3rd place winner was just the Premier Print Shield. The 4th place was the plain print with no spray or wax. I didn't like the Clear Jet Semigloss spay as it seemed to dull the print but did make a uniform look with no gloss differential. All of the coating techniques eliminated the gloss differential. The waxed only print had a uniform "shine" to the surface just barely a little more than the unwaxed print but without the gloss differential. This is a non-issue to me as I mount everything behind Tru-Vue Museum Glass which eliminates glare as well as knocking out the UV. I have just received some Crane Museo Silver Rag and am doing the same tests I did with the Innova F Type Gloss paper. I'll report back in a couple of days with results on coatings for Silver Rag. Cheers, TK [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Possible Non-Toxic Silver Rag Solution
2006-07-05 by TK Thompson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.