I did a little reading on that website he gave us. http://www.picreator.co.uk/articles/3_renaissance_wax.htm Apparently Renaissance Wax was created in the 19th century to act as a substite for traditional waxes for the purpose of preserving antique furniture, and later rare documents. It was designed for this purpose from petroleum products to replace bees wax and other natural waxes that had been used by conservators because of the acid content of these "natural" waxes. I wrote them an email asking for all information they may have about the suitability of using this product on rag papers and pigment inkjet prints in particular. If they write me back I'll post it. Usually Light Impressions does their homework on this kind of thing since their primary clinet base involves conservators museums and galleries and they have sold it for years. The interesting part of all this for me was finding out that bees wax was destructive to documents and developed a very acidic environment over time. What does that mean? Well, all the encaustic art work out there in collections all over the world from artists ranging from Jasper Johns to Doug and Mike Starn are coated with it. There has even been commentary by some artists that coating their inkjet prints with encaustic, composed of bees wax, gave them protection and greater longevity; apparently not. I could be missing something? As to Renaissance Wax, sounds like it does protect long term. It would be nice to know for sure. Where is Wilhelm when you need him? John --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Charlie" <psiempyo@...> wrote: > > I am interested in what happens to this wax long term. We know that > the rag substrate and pigment can go well over 100 years with > excellent stability but what about the wax? Yellowing and flaking > (even if it occurs after I am long gone) are my concern. > > > charlie >
Message
Renaissance Wax vs Natural Wax
2006-07-07 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.