On Friday 07 July 2006 12:08, Steve Gledhill wrote: > Bjorn, > ... speechless was my first reaction to your effrontery to criticise my > providing what for some might be helpful information. > ... then irritation that you openly boast of your laziness. > ... then ... what the hell ... > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/messages/40459. > ... join the list, you might learn even more. > Steve Gledhill > http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk/ I'm sorry this came off as criticism. I've been burned before by the impersonal nature of email communication, but I guess I haven't learned my lesson yet. My point was merely that since this list is a "one-to-many" form of communication, a simple unambiguous link can save time for everybody who reads the message. A few minutes digging around is not a big deal for one person, but multiplied by the hundreds who might be interested, it's a waste. Unfortunately, I ruined this attempt at improving communication by being ungracious in my email. Thanks for the information (and the link :-)). (Sigh, Yahoo says "The group DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint is temporarily unavailable." All the great data in the archives is essentially held at the good will of Yahoo. I maintain another archive of the mailing list here: http://helgaas.com/photo/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/ but my history doesn't go back far enough. Oh, well.) > Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Wednesday 05 July 2006 14:30, Steve Gledhill wrote: > > > A quick search via Google turned up a link from early 2004 on this > > > forum. Go to message 40459 and thread. > > > > The beauty of the web is that you can supply a specific URL. > > I don't know how to find the message you mention, since I > > read this list by email, and I'm too lazy to spend ten minutes > > digging around on yahoo.
Message
Re: Possible Non-Toxic Silver Rag Solution
2006-07-10 by Bjorn Helgaas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.