See Mitch Alland's File (May 2006) in the Imageprint Yahoo Group file section. The discussion of dot gain curves there is applicable to Piezography (which is where it came from, originally). As Mitch argue, it allows soft proofing directly. Myself, I've always preferred the alternative technique Mitch discusses, of (1) getting an image that prints reasonably well in Piezography (or Imageprint), (2) on you monitor in Photoshop, create a curves layer such that the monitor image matches the print as precisely as possible, and then (3) use that curves layer as a top layer in editing subsequent images, but being careful to disable or delete the curves layer before printing. I find this simpler, and it's easier to do fine tweaks on a curves layer than a dot gain layer; the curves layer functions essentially as a soft-proof "layer," except that you have to disable it before printing -- Mitch objects to this, but I find I can remember (almost always), and the simplicity/flexibility outweighs that disadvantage. De gustibus non disputandum est. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Piezography soft proof...
2006-07-24 by Iverson, William
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.