Yes, when I first made the action I was only using warm and cool profiles, hence the default layer names. You can readily tell which layer is which by simply dragging the upper layer opacity slider back and forth and observing the hue shift. If you selected the LW profile first it will be on the bottom layer (COOL), so your assumption is correct about the proportions. Carl On Aug 15, 2006, at 11:36 AM, zisskar wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield > <list@...> wrote: > > > > Forgot to add a link to a sample hue blended image to my last post. > > This one was about 60% Lenswork warm and 40% Seagull Selenium. > > > > http://www.pbase.com/scho/image/65156176 > > > > > Hello Carl, > > I downloaded your hueblender action and tried it in couple of > photographs so far, thank you for making it public, just clarify some > points for me please. > The two layers created are always named COOL and WARM regardless of > the profiles chosen during conversion. If that's correct, am I also > right to assume that the bottom layer represents the 1st chosen > profile and the upper layer the second? > So if for example I choose as 1st profile the LW and as 2nd the Se, > I'll get two layers with the names Cool and Warm and if I adjust the > opacity of the upper layer (named warm but actually being the Se) to > 40% it is as if I choose LW 60% and Se 40%. Is this assumption > correct? > > . > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Toning your grayscale images for web or commercial printing
2006-08-15 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.