Clayton, I certainly defer to you. I remember discussing the original concept while you were writing the articles. Based on your thoughts, I hit upon the concept of using GG2.2 as a working space and DG10% as a printer space to get perfect BO WYSIWYG in a 1280 with Gen4 K and later Eboni. That's worked for me for years and I apparently I never completely digested your Article #4. When my last 1280 got too long in the tooth, I bought a 2400. But I still have a 890 and just made 20 Eboni BO prints on Condor BW for a show with it. All with the working space of GG2.2 and printer space of DG10% that has always worked for me. I was 19 of 20 for the first print being the one I will use in the show. I guess it's just knowing how it works after using it for so many years. Bob --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@...> wrote: > > Hello Bob, > > >Isn't "profile - same as source" the problem? If working on a file > >that is DG20%, won't something like DG 10% as a printer profile be > >needed to match monitor and print? I got this from Clayton's article > >#4 years back. > > Or is it too late at night and I'm missing something? > > Yep, too late at night I guess. Same As Source for the printer (or > "back end") profile is the key that makes that workflow so easy. It > ensures that the back end is always the same as the front end, which > is what allows us to change the screen image without changing the > print. It's the key to getting good WYSIWYG by making the screen > match the print (as opposed to changing the print to match the screen). > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm >
Message
Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light
2006-08-22 by Bob Michaels
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.