Greetings to all from the land of Ouzo At this point I've owned 2 each of the above printers: an R200, R220, and an R300 & R340. I had initially assumed when I went from the R300 to the R200 that since the mechanics were the same, the print quality would also be as good. I was dissapointed: the R300 was flawless, the R200 banded right out of the box, and no amount of cleaning/alignment fixed it. I eventually ran it into the ground doing color proofs, and replaced it with a new R220. It was even worse, exhibiting a cyan registration problem so severe that it is useless even for color proofing. It will go back to Epson, with a hail of curses. Needing a color proofer in a hurry, I bought an R340 on July 4th sale for $130, not too painfull. It printed beautifully, almost perfect on all channels, excellent BO, and good enough to separate out 4-5 channels for making banding free internegatives. So: is this luck of the draw, or am I seeing a pattern? The R300 series printers seem to be made in Phillipines (at least mine were) but the R200 printers were made in China. My suspicion is the QC and/or manufacturing standards of the Chinese printers is not equal to the Phillipine ones. Does anyone have any experiences to relate here? Any opinions? Steven Karafyllakis On dial-up from Greece-I miss my DSL!
Message
Epson R200 series vs. R300 series print quality
2006-08-23 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.