Yes. I have a Hextone mix formula from you that used 7600 Epson inks or MIs clones, in my notes but didn't note the message#. Note just states that the older machines would be at a disadvantage with it due to darker middle inks. Regards Duane --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: > > That message was not the one I had in mind. There is also at least one > UC-based formula out there, I believe. > > > > With the advent of the LLK, we can probably make all my inksets from Epson > inks. > > > > I've also published a dilution base that uses only disclosed chemicals in > the UC inkset. So, the chances of incompatibilies are minimized. I've put > this in a short pdf on relative viscosity comparisons and the method I use. > See http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Viscosity_Comparisons.pdf > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/> > > > > > > _____ > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of dlruckus > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:17 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Cone v. MIS > > > > Daniela. > Try Message #23225. It refers to a UC based Quad formula from Paul. > > Regards > Duane > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhit > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" > <paul.roark@> wrote: > > > > Daniela, > > > > > > > > It was on this list, but I don't know the message #. I did the exercise > > fairly early to be sure there was an alternative to MIS pigments in case > > those prices were increased unduly. As it happens, MIS did not raise > > prices, so my incentives to have second sources decreased substantially. > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul > > > > www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroar <http://www.paulroark.com/> k.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > From: DigitalBlackandWhit > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > eThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhit > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > eThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > > dgattarino > > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 7:04 AM > > To: DigitalBlackandWhit > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > eThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Cone v. MIS > > > > > > > > > > > > (I have published entire formulas for making B&W inksets from Epson > > inks. > > > However, no major player has opted to pick them up due to the cost > > of the > > > inputs.) > > > > > > > Hello Paul, > > > > where did you publish the formulas you mentioned in your post? > > I am doing several experiments myself and like to compare with yours. > > Thanks. > > > > Cheers > > Daniela > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Cone v. MIS
2006-08-23 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.