Digital BW, The Print

I suspect  most people are happy with the R200 series, but there 
could still be a quality difference that we haven't picked up on 
yet. Problem is, most list members have bought into the R200 (why 
pay for extra junk you don't need?) so there may not be enough basis 
for comparison.
Here's a question for all who still have the original box: where was 
your printer made? The info is somewhere on the top flaps. And if 
you choose to report back, include relative quality of printing in 
terms of banding/lack therof. That should be interesting.

Steven Karafyllakis

 I will say I am happy with the results of my R220 for printing, 
both with
> using 3rd-party inks for everday printing (I'm on  a budget) and 
Epson inks
> with my printer for photo printing.  And the people I'd printed 
photos for
> have been very happy with my prints & the paper I used.
> 
>  
> 
> Megan
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> bastian7201
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 1:58 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson R200 series vs. R300 series print 
quality
> 
>  
> 
> Hello Steven,
> 
> After getting a D70s I was about ready to buy an r220. Now, after
> seeeng your message I am unsure about it. Would you then recommend 
to
> skip the 220 and get the 300? I think I can get the r300 for a good
> price here in germany, in fact for about the same price of the 
220. 
> As I planned to follow Paul Roarks/Inksupply.com instructions for 
B&W
> printing with the 220, do they still work with the r300 or will I 
need
> to set up things differently?
> 
> I would appreciat very much anny comments.
> 
> Sebastian 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>