i'm using the k3 inks from atlex. i'll give the Velvet a try at $1.24 per page. http://www.atlex.com/Epson/more/pro_velvet_fine_art.htm right now i'm loaded to the gills w/ Red River Aurora and Dourian Art papers. what i'm finding is that i like the 2400 prints which are predominantly smooth, bright images (lots of white) w/ little in the way of dark shadows. for darker images w/ heavy shadows i prefer the old B/O 1280 prints. good things about the 2400: faster printing, no clogs (so far), color pigments, great design and handy roll feed for heavy papers. takes up far less space than i anticipated. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@...> wrote: > > Hello Kevin, > > >i kind of miss my 1280 w/ BO work flow. i got the 2400 and have yet > >to duplicate the luminance i got w/ the 1280. > > Yes, it does seem like a step down in that regard. However, count > your blessings, it's much better than many other full ink systems. > Under a loupe I can see very fine dots in the highlights with bare > paper showing between. It of course doesn't go as far into the > midtones as BO, but it's still much better than systems that fully > cover the paper. It still retains the clarity that is reminiscent of > a BO print. > > Are you using K3 or something else? If K3, have you tried using VFA? > It has become my favorite K3 paper, with great dmax and luminance. > I'm printing my portfolios with it and they have gotten very high > praise. It's great stuff. > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm >
Message
Re: 1280 BO printing looks too light
2006-08-28 by Kevin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.