Andre, I've not tried the Fibraprint, but I have used the Silver Rag and the Pearl. For me, the Pearl is superior and good enough to use in my part of an upcoming show at the San Diego Natural History Museum. That may be because the Silver Rag base is a little creamier and I most often prefer a cleaner white. The SR also has a more pronounced bronzing effect. And I found that the Hahnemuehle profile was extremely good for my particular Epson R1800 and the Crane profile for SR had a generally yellowish feel. I was able to calibrate some profiles in house and they showed similar differences. But in my opinion, these materials still aren't good enough to hang next to silver prints without suffering in the comparison. I haven't yet been able to try the paper on a 4800 or other K3 machine. Will Gibson Andre wrote: >A recent article on the Luminous-Landscape site concludes that these >papers are not good enough. They have that "Naugahyde vinyl" look. > >http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/surface-reflections.shtml > >Cheers, >Andr\ufffd > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] FibaPrint and Silver Rag not good enough?
2006-09-05 by will gibson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.