I have tried all 3 papers on my 9800 and 4800. In order of preference, I like Hahn. Pearl, then Innova, then Silver Rag. I agree with the author of that piece that the surfaec on Silver Rag is too obtrusive and I've thought that since I first tested a sample a few months ago. I don't, however, agree with him that the Hahn. is radically better than the Innova; I use them pretty interchangeably, altough the surface is a bit better on the Hahn. and the Innova is a bit whiter than the Hahn (if I'm recalling correctly). If that guy is looking to precisely replicate his wet darkroom, then I guess all these papers do fall short of the mark. If, on the other hand, you want a lovely archival paper with incredible blacks and overall quality, the I think either the Hahn. or Innova would serve you well. > Has anyone here tried all three papers on a K3 printer? If so, are > you finding the same results as the luminous landscape article? > > Last favorite darkroom papers I used were Ilford Gallerie and Zone IV > Brilliant. Still using Epson Premium Luster at this point because I > haven't read anything on these new papers that sounds encouraging > that any of them will match the look of my old favorites. > > Jim >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] FibaPrint and Silver Rag not good enough?
2006-09-05 by chipcarterdc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.