I have experimented extensively with both on Epson 1160, 2200 and finally 7600 printers. I currently use Piezotone Museum Black, with both the Selenium and Carbon Sepia ink sets. QTR allows me to blend between these two and I just built a split tone version mixing the sets. The control of tone is not radical, but allows for fine tuning within the range of warm to somewhat cool. I had the greenies with first edition Cone inks Moved to Piezotones but wanted the ability to vary tone I experimented with MIS UT2, and UT7 but had problems with mis-labled cartridges on 3 occasions, leaky cartridges, unavailable inks and carts that had bad chips and would not work. I finally settled on the configuration mentioned above. It seems that hardly anyone else had the QC issues I experienced with MIS so they seem to have gotten their act together, but at this point I have been printing happily for 2 years with my current configuration and am too busy making prints (and money) to experiment as I used to be. I really enjoyed the absolute control of tone I had with the UT7 inks. My 2 cents. James Haney On Aug 21, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Barry wrote: > I'm fairly new to the group. There seems to be a preference toward > MIS over Cones B&W > inksets. Could someone fill me in on the reason? I'm running 2200, > 2400, 9600, 1280 > printers with, primarily, Red River papers. > > Thanks, > -Barry > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Cone v. MIS
2006-09-13 by James Haney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.