I have had several issues with MIS quality control including mislabeled carts (e.g Neutral ink in what was supposed to be warm), non-functioning chips, etc. But when properly done by MIS, Paul Roark's ink-sets and techniques have worked well for me both in a C86 and R220. But I must also add that when I first got my NK7's for my 2200 from cone the inks were fine but the profiles they posted in QTR were REALLY wrong. They did however 'discover' their error shortly afterward and first make available for the asking and later post corrected profiles in the latest version of QTR. Both can make beautiful prints with ease of use and variable tone nod going to MIS and smoothness nod going to Cone. No reason not to try both and make up your own mind or do as I do and use both depending on what I want for the individual image and situation. But in both cases you must look at what comes out and be sure everything is as it's supposed to be. Michael Vendrell --- Craig Roberts <crgrbrts@...> wrote: > I've never used the Piezography inks, but enjoy > printing with the MIS > UT2 series. I'm very happy with the results. > > For the sake of economy I buy the ink in bulk and > refill my spongeless > cartridges by hand. It's very easy to do, takes > just a few minutes and > saves tons of money. Although I've gotten a bad > cartridge from MIS, > manually refiling also avoids factory QC problems. > > Craig Roberts > Washington, DC > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Cone v. MIS
2006-09-13 by Michael Vendrell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.