Digital BW, The Print

I should have made no comments about the prints. I have not seen them
myself. There's something addictive about the taste of my foot.
I'm hypersensitive to the entire issue. When you have people with a
definite agenda showing up to galleries with loups looking for reasons
to slam our prints, etc., well, I'm just tired of the whole deal.
We have, however, quietly slipped into an era of problem free output
with no fanfare and hardly noticing it ourselves. Some of the most
beautiful monochromatic prints I've seen are digital ink, and I
believe it will get even better.
My apologies for any possible slight I may have enabled with my post
about the Walker Evans exhibit. I'm happy it's even occurred, with ink
and silver together.
Tyler


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Patsenka
<tpatsenka@...> wrote:
>
> Hello All, I will not repeat my recent history with this project, see  
> my post from a few weeks ago.
> But I experienced no posterization with the images produced Martson/ 
> Hill. The general reaction
> to the show is very good, even with some minor faults. On Tuesday of  
> this week John Hill gave
> one of the directors of the Library of Congress a tour and he wants  
> to possibly have it travel.
> There is nothing shoddy about any of the images, in fact they exceed  
> most of W.E.'s standards.
> Thank you, Tom
>