> It's hard to argue with the concept that only the best is good enough. But, there's also the aphorism that "the perfect is the enemy of the good". I take that to mean that chasing the perfect technique may keep you from making "merely good" prints of your truly creative work, which is what I think we really should be striving for. I also have to wonder about images that only seem to be interesting because of the technique used to create them - is it my vision or my advanced technique that I'm offering? Shouldn't great vision with merely good technique trump poor vision, no matter how exalted a technique is used? If it's all about technique, why should we print and show anything but grayscales? Obviously (at least I think it's obvious), there has to be some balance: pursue your technique while refining your vision, but don't let "merely good" technique prevent you from doing your creative work - expand your technique as your vision demands. Frank
Message
Re: What Makes a Good Digital B&W Print???
2006-10-03 by Frank Kolwicz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.