Hello Frank. I pretty much shared your thoughts, I believe, in the body of the post that was quoted. My thought is that the out take was CD's way of segueing into a pitch for the latest and greatest. Clever promotion. Nothing wrong with the latest and greatest from my perspective---but, I suspect that most of those walking the halls of great museums know easily what they like and are impressed by, and few beyond scholars and artists disect the techniques and tools used. CD's target audience was and is already predisposed toward the new, but the print he mentioned must have been impressive enough on it's own to make people want it. I doubt greatly that a nothing ho..hum content would have drawn much aclaim, irrespective of technical print quality. Otherwise all would have been saying "man.I want that machine" rather than "I want that print". CD is a great contributer of his knowledge to this and other groups but his recompense is to gain a platform. Just my IMO. Regards Duane --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Frank Kolwicz <kolwicz@...> wrote: > > > It's hard to argue with the concept that only the best is good enough. > > But, there's also the aphorism that "the perfect is the enemy of the > good". I take that to mean that chasing the perfect technique may keep > you from making "merely good" prints of your truly creative work, which > is what I think we really should be striving for. > > I also have to wonder about images that only seem to be interesting > because of the technique used to create them - is it my vision or my > advanced technique that I'm offering? Shouldn't great vision with > merely good technique trump poor vision, no matter how exalted a > technique is used? If it's all about technique, why should we print and > show anything but grayscales? > > Obviously (at least I think it's obvious), there has to be some balance: > pursue your technique while refining your vision, but don't let "merely > good" technique prevent you from doing your creative work - expand your > technique as your vision demands. > > Frank >
Message
Re: What Makes a Good Digital B&W Print???
2006-10-04 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.