Hello Tom, >I've recently begun to show my photographs publicly and have a >question about signed and numbered prints. I've seen that done. I >think it would be a bit silly for my prints. What is the >conventional wisdom about signing and/or numbering prints to show or >sell? There are several approaches and no hard and fast rules. You can basically do whatever you want. Also, there is a difference between simple numbering and limited editions. If you are selling prints as art that you want to be tracable back to you as the artist, then there should at least be a signature somewhere. Otherwise it's not much different than selling postcards or greeting cards, and even those have an author and copyright notice. Regarding numbering, I like to number my prints because I keep track of print sales in a database and want them to be uniquely identifiable. I believe it also adds to the impression for the buyer that they are individually made and not mass produced. It also is an aid to them if they are listing household items for insurance purposes. I don't do limited editions. As far as where to sign, I leave a 1" border around the image and put the print title in pencil on the left, just under the image bottom border, and my signature with print # on the right. When I mat a print, I make the window slightly bigger than the image so the title and signature are visible. This is a very common approach for photography as frameable art. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: Signing prints
2006-10-05 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.