Digital BW, The Print

That goes for the UT-FSN. But what about the UT-FS set?
Is it blended?
And are there tone or density shift when the printer is not used for
some time?

Thanks,

I g o r



And if so,
> is it entirely free of tone shifts due to infrequent use of the printer?
> I can imagine that in pigment based inks -blended or not- the pigments
> settle when they stand still for some time.


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> The FSN is a blended carbon + color pigs inkset.  I used a variant
of it in
> my 7500, I called the FSN+ inkset.  It shows significant tone
changes if the
> printer sits very long without being used.  I'm now trying a non-blended
> approach to see if it reduces the tone changes.  I have not measured the
> tone shifts in the new approach yet.  So, it's too soon to see which
> approach will be better.  (I'm betting on the non-blended approach.)
> 
>  
> 
> Paul
> 
> www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>   
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Igor
> Wesdorp
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:50 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] UT7 or UT-3D for my Epson 7600
> 
>  
> 
> <paul.roark@> wrote: My experience with blended B&W inksets (all
> I've tried) is that they tend to have tone shifts if the inks are left
> idle for more than a week. 
> 
> Paul,
> 
> Am I right in assuming that UT-FS is NOT a blended ink-set? And if so,
> is it entirely free of tone shifts due to infrequent use of the printer?
> I can imagine that in pigment based inks -blended or not- the pigments
> settle when they stand still for some time.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I g o r
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>