I once worked with a production manager who claimed that if there were no such thing as paperwork, he would have invented it. Mike On Oct 9, 2006, at 2:38 PM, CorrPro96@... wrote: > > In a message dated 10/9/2006 1:55:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > dfaprinting@... writes: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" > <cj@...> wrote: > > > > Is there a need for some sort of ISO-type industry standards > group to > > define and publish technical standards? > > > > > > NO! Defects are unacceptable! But I guess that is just my own opinion. > I would never let anything that showed obvious printing defects out of > my shop! If "we" want this form of printing technology to be taken as > serious art, this is the standard that we must strive to achieve. > As we > know, anyone can turn out a print on the inkjet at home which is what > we need to fight against. > > Perhaps there could be a set of guidelines to follow, in terms of > presentation, for gallery operators and other exhibit platforms. It > is not only obvious > physical defects. > It is not a new thing, unique to inkjet printing we are talking > about.... > there were always problems with print quality somehow escaping from > darkrooms > all over the country. I've seen some disasters very carefully > matted and > framed, hanging on library walls. And of course there is the old > maxim, "If you > can't make it good, make it big". > Just because a print comes from a wide format printer, doesn't make > it good, > although some folks seem to think so. > I'm looking forward to Amadou Diallo's "Print Off", to see what I > can do to > improve my print quality. > > Richard (Brooklyn) > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: "Individuals" Show - Standards?
2006-10-09 by Michael Kitei
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.