Thank you,Amadou, for thinking up and providing us with this very interesting evening. For those of you who haven't followed the discussion, we were first supposed to print a fully manipulated, sharpened image with an embedded profile on Photo Rag 308. I naturally assumed that all these prints would end up looking pretty similar. My print was done on the Epson 2400 with no rip, and with a downloaded Hahnemuhle profile. I assumed that this print would serve as the control, with the more sophisticated systems providing more subtle, somehow better, prints. However, this is not what turned out. In fact, the standard prints showed a surprising amount of variability.Actually,someone mentioned that the manipulated prints looked more alike than the standard prints. As Dave Tobie mentioned above, the Epson 2400 print looked about as good as most. Recall that these prints had no user imput other than setting up the printer parameters. So, I'm a bit puzzled about what this all means. Perhaps, one of the more knowledgable members can comment on what we found. Evan --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Eric Neilsen" <e.neilsen2@...> wrote: > > It was difficult to make any absolute judgments about the print quality due > to a number of factors; size of room, number of prints, and quality of > light. What did strike us was that we did indeed have many different looking > prints. We left behind the Version A prints, those that were to be printed > straight, to allow for a print exchange type distribution of the image for > inspection. I got in very late last night from the trip, but will post some > shots that I took of the prints handing on the walls. I will need to catch > up on business so it may be tomorrow or the next day before that happens. > > > > I didn't take any notes other than visual inspection that night. There was a > variety of print quality presented that night for sure. I for one was very > glad to have made the effort to be there and to meet the folks that were > also in attendance. It was however, too short an event and too long a table > to really talk to everyone but still a very enjoyable night. Thanks for > putting it together Amadou !!!!! > > > > > > I am sure that we can all make gray scale ramps from our settings if that > truly would mean something. However, as a silver printer for many years, I > know that there are many ways to skin a cat, and file prep for printing will > vary as does negative creation and printing still do in the land of silver. > It will always still be in the hand and eye of the human element (aka the > printer) to truly make the call as to where to place certain values. There > was no information collected on the prints, or by me, as to whether any > calibration equipment was used and if so what kind. > > > > More on the event later, > > > > Cheers > > Eric > > > > > > Eric Neilsen Photography > > 4101 Commerce Street > > Suite 9 > > Dallas, TX 75226 > > http://e.neilsen.home.att.net > > http://ericneilsenphotography.com > > Skype ejprinter > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: B&W Print Off comments
2006-11-07 by Evan Wolarsky
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.