I have been reading the discussions of late, particularly those surrounding the 2400/2200. I really am at a loss as to what I should do. There seems to be a few like myself who are beyond a simple push print on a cheap photo printer, but not at the building a custom profile, with all the D'max detecting spectrogizmos with a 1024bit file with a 19 cartridge custom blended oak aged, triple distilled ink set. That I live in the middle of nowhere in a country (Namibia)that has less then a dozen high end privately owned ink jet photo printers, less then a dozen resident D2X/1DSmkll's makes access to a dedicated high end print lab non-existent. If you are a serious photographer here regardless of color or B & W you have to get it done on your own. There are no schools, seminars, workshops and we suffer with a maximum 64kbs net connection unless you want to pop for a dedicated satellite uplink. I do well with my real job, so for me it is not a question of money. It is a question of diminishing returns. So here is the question I have a 2400 on order, I have a 2200 in perfect condition sitting on my desk. Will the 2200 with a dedicated B & W ink set, either MIS or Cone, using their profiles, on a high end paper produce a noticeably superior output to the naked eye then the 2400 with the Epson ink set on a high end paper in the ABW mode? I remain humbled by the depth and extent of the knowledge exhibited by the primary contributors to this forum. I recognize that my question is on the face of it simple and is certainly not overly technical but in a sense it is a real world question. Thanks Christopher L. Johnston Johnston-Namibia c.c. PO Box 354 Omaruru Namibia chris@...m.na
Message
My head is about to explode
2006-11-15 by namibiajohnston
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.