Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: SCSI or IDE for new Photoshop machine (OT)

2002-01-21 by Richard Wolfson

hi Mark -
 
Thanks for taking the time to answer. 
 
Yes, the SCSI drives I'm considering are the Ultra 160, and the Adaptec
drive that works with them. The 15,000 rpm scratch disk is as fast a
drive as you can buy.
 
I didn't know there was a problem with IBM drives, but I'll watch out
for that. If I go IDE, I'll probably use Western Digital.
 
cheers,
Richard


-----Original Message-----
From: marktuckerdotcom [mailto:mark@...] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:33 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: SCSI or IDE for new Photoshop machine (OT)


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Richard Wolfson" 
<rwolfson@L...> wrote:
> I'm about to build a new PC for working on large images (500 
MB) in
> Photoshop,

I'm on a Mac, so things will be different for you, but I've heard 
about some issues with some of the IBM IDE drives, especially 
the 75gig model. I think there might even have been a 
class-action suit related to them. The warranty on IDE drives is 
shorter, I've heard, but I don't know about all of them. 

If you go SCSI, I'd go for fastest SCSI, maybe the SCSI 160. If 
you're gonna mess with all the SCSi witchcraft, you might as well 
get the speed boost. But the money is much more for SCSI, but 
I'm sure you know that.

For the record, I have that IBM75 as my second drive, and it's 
working fine. But I've got my eye on it.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.