Greg wrote: >Changing the name, sorry nothing more to add. Maybe a better title would have been, "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin." C. David wrote: > ... viewing distance is a whole different matter. > I haven't had much complaint about the highlights for > some time now (except in terms of hue control), its the shadow > detail I've been most interested in! Shadow detail was the only area I saw where visible differences existed between the best rip output I have and my 2400 output. And there a good profile would probably make the difference. I was also surprised at how little difference there was between RGB and ABW mode print quality. It almost looks like Epson added the ABW mode more to facilitate easy user control than to improve print quality. Bill Schaub, editor of Shutterbug, noted in the latest issue: "The idea that quality prints could only be made by a small set of darkroom workers or those who could afford custom labs is now finished." My conclusion is that it's the human behind the machine, not the printer or rip itself that is going to make the visible differences. I've been using a rip lately, but I do so because it allows me to control the printer better, not because it is inherently better. Paul www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] K3 vs. quad (Was Follow-up ...)
2006-11-18 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.