--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@...> wrote: snip... > When I see all > these people fighting color casts of this and that and all the other > clogging and related issues I just cringe, because this K6/K7 method > is so easy and so trouble free and so smooth and beautiful. > > John I just wanted to echo this statement. The K7s have been my ink of choice in a 2200 for over a year and I've been very happy with them. They're easy to use and trouble free... no clogs and no spectro required. The best part, though, is they're simply gorgeous. I'm spending my time now shooting, editing and printing photography rather than babysitting a sick printer or endlessly tweaking linearizations, etc. With a printing process this transparent I can better see the strong and weak links in my photographic chain, and as such, focus my attention on improving my craft as a photographer which is liberating. I would compare it to making critical audio judgements of music played through consumer level speakers vs. pro studio monitors. I'll take the pro studio monitors any day. And likewise the K7s. Will
Message
Re: Comparing prints for that "3 dimensional quality"?
2006-11-25 by wjlafever
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.