On banding: I think that you should first make the target larger (use half the circle) and use 360 PPI or 720 PPI in the image at 1:1 scale on Epson systems. The last to reduce any banding as a result of resampling in driver or application you print from. The targets are now at 300 PPI, good for Canons and HPs. Set no print sharpening in for example Qimage. There may still be enough other factors than density shifts that influence the result. After that you could try to add a minimum of noise to the image in order to reduce banding while keeping the tone range representation. Had to do that too often on gradations I had to print for customers. Depending on the quality of the total printing system you have to scale (but keep 360 PPI) and/or add noise to get rid of banding. The last may make the test less discriminating. There will be some relation in printer quality between printing 256 grey shades perfectly separated and good detail representation, both on any time of the day. If not this test would be over the top anyway. Wonder how many printers actually can pass your test right now without banding + having the 256 steps perfectly separated. Print like you would with the normal images later on, so using the perceptually correct printer profile. Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: New linearization test image uploaded
2006-12-14 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.