--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, CDTobie@... wrote: > > > In a message dated 12/18/06 10:58:50 AM, j.h.j.h@... writes: > > > > One way or another I suspected this. But what is then the absolute > > measure to be used in comparing results from different measurement > > setups, L* or density? I assume density, since L is a relative measure. > > Right? If so, if someone makes a claim in L-values, it should be noted > > what system (s)he uses. > > > > No, L* is absolute... its density that is often expressed in relative terms. > Density is often specified in the measured value, or minus paper, so there it is already relative to something. That's why I usually just use L*a*b* values to represent things like this. Lab value should be able to be traced back to the BACRA tiles used for accuracy testing, and are listed in the measurement device's specification.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] QTR dmax (was 5K v. 3K smoothness)
2006-12-18 by Greg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.