Hello Steve, The most important advantage to a RAW capture is you have the ability "develop" the frame during editing and change things like ISO, white balance, etc., within limits. Once you're happy with the file, you can transfer it to Photoshop in 8-bit mode and edit without fear. If you're going to print the image without any further editing, stay in 8-bit. If you're going to use the edited file for further manipulation in another edit, you can still edit in 8-bit, save a flattened copy of it in 16-bit, or "apply image" it to the subsequent 16-bit edit session. In other words, only use 16-bit edits when you absolutely have to. Within the confine of an 8-bit layered PS file, Photoshop always use highest precision math operations (unless their engineers perform some funny data conversion to their programming buffers). It's when it saves it to jpeg, tiff, or flattened PSD that it saves the final computed value and you lose the 8 LSB (least significant bits) that would otherwise still be there if you save in 16-bit. This precision loss will also happen if the file is "copy merged" or "apply image" or "duplicate flattened" to be used in another document. So in your case, 1. edit in 8 bit and save as 8-bit layered PSD, or 16-bit flattened PSD or TIFF for future edits. 2. edit in 8 bit and save as 8-bit as a final version for printing or web slideshow, etc. (but keep the original jpeg around). Even for folks that start out with RAW, edit in 8-bit any way, and when problem is detected, convert to 16-bit then apply image from the 16-bit redevelopment from RAW (unless you have accidentally deleted it). All adjustment layers still apply. --nick --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Kobrin" <kobrins@...> wrote: > > Up to this point my inputs to B&W processing have been limited to > scanned film and raw files. However, I have a new camera that does > not have a raw option. Am I correct that the first steps in a JPEG > workflow should be to save the file as tiff and then change the mode > to 16 bit? > > Steve >
Message
Re: JPEG workflow question
2006-12-21 by Nick H. Nugent
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.