Digital BW, The Print

Take a look at this approach: http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/4K+.pdf  Part of
the point was to separate the carbon (where I prefer MIS) from the LC and
LM, in part because I prefer the Epson LM.  The MIS un-coated pigs bronze
less, and the 2200 has the space for a Glop in there that will probably get
you a virtually bronze-free print.

 

Paul

www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  

 

 

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Alan Zinn
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 5:56 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Bronzing and EPL

 

I swore off anything but OEM inks and paper for my virgin 2200. Having 
suffered through the trials of trying to do dedicated B/W on a 1280 
and non-OEM inks I threw in the towel. I had no problems over the 
years with a slew of Epson printers (like, never, ever) as long as I 
used OEM. 

Trouble is, with the 2200, QTR and EPL I get more brass than a middle 
school band. The prints really bitch. Anybody got a sure cure for 
bronzing on semigloss or luster papers (Epson's or whatever)? I'd be 
willing to fall off the wagon and use non-OEM blacks. I want to keep 
OEM in the other positions. 

Thanks,

AZ

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]