Digital BW, The Print

Greg, Is all the paper printed on? Perhaps a few blank sheets or strips from
different rolls or package might be useful. You data will or may stand for
those inks and that paper. What about other batches? Do they all get the
same relative heat and environmental issues? Anybody willing to take this on
get a high five from me. I am just asking question to see how those variable
are being addressed if at all. 

 

And since EEM is showing it's true color, I once again why one would use it
at all or for testing? 

 

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

214-827-8301

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

 

Skype : ejprinter

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Greg
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:10 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Claria fade test

 

I haven't compared the measurement files yet, so yes the PGPP might be
within the device's error envelope. The Merlin actually shows a very
slight change in paper white, going toward blue, which again could be
measurement error. But the change in EEM in definitely not measurement
error. To my eye EEM is exactly the same color paper white on both
sides now, just proving why some many of us will not use it for
important images. It should be noted that the EEM change in whiteness
seemingly has changed the over all gamut with a yellow shift. Not too
surprising, but I have never really seen what happens when the paper
yellows. To the eye they all look about like you would expect an
profile target to look, and from the gamut plots, nothing really jumps
out as being worng. So Claria (so far) really is lasting pretty well.
I'll carry the test out until I get bored, or I get a bunch of
hatemail like Mr. Livick did.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]