Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

C88 plus, EEM, H Photo Rag and MIS Pro UT-EZ - (almost) final word

2007-01-29 by marcinemem

Hello Everybody!

As some of you remember I was totally new at BW printing and I 
decided to buy Epson C88 plus printer, MIS Pro UT-EZ inkset, 
Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 308 and Epson Enhanced Matte paper.

Now it is time to share my thoughts.

I started with printing color pictures with original inkset on EEM 
paper. Results? For me - stunning! Resolution, colors, contrast - I 
don't need more than this. OK, blacks could be better but it is not 
so visible for me.

Then I tried BO printing (still on Epson inkset) and I was woeful. 
Terrible banding. I made nozzles check, cleaning and other required 
procedures but without any effect on paper.

OK, I forgot BO printing on this printer. I have been waiting for 
package from MIS and finally I received it. I changed cartridges, put 
EEM paper and printed first picture. BANDING, blacks were also so-so. 
I made nozzles cleaning and other stuff, loaded Photo Rag and waited 
for change in quality. And IT WAS THERE! No sign of banding, blacks 
were blacks finally, that was a huge difference. But I said - OK, it 
is only scan from 35mm made on flatbed scanner. Now it is time for 
MF. I chose and prepared picture (scanned on the same Epson flatbed 
scanner from Ilford HP5+ developed with Ilfosol S) loaded Photo Rag 
paper and then I printed it. I set everything as Paul Roark advised 
(Gamma 2.2, Contrast -10). For the first couple of seconds/minutes 
(?) I couldn't say anything. I was blown away! BLOWN AWAY! 
Resolution, blacks, tonal transitions. I would spend all my life in 
darkroom and I couldn't produce anything like that!!! Then I checked 
ink levels and worried for a while :) But it was definitely worth of 
it. Now I have to order additional inks from MIS but as I already 
wrote...

...IT WAS WORTH OF IT.

Thank you very much for help.

Happy me!

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.